Remote Adjudicator Certification Program Participant Evaluation Form

Participant

Presiding Examiner

Session #

Please evaluate the RAC Participant’s performance by offering a YES or NO response and brief additional comments as appropriate:

The participant was punctual and appeared comfortable and at ease within the Zoom environment.

Yes
No

Comments

The participant followed remote examination procedures as outlined in the RAC Guidelines.

Yes
No

Comments

The Participant conducted the examinations within the time blocks allotted.

Yes
No

Comments

The Participant was efficient in organizing and utilizing the examination materials.

Yes
No

Comments

The Participant followed established procedures in conducting Technical Tests.

Yes
No

Comments

The Participant followed established procedures in conducting Ear Tests.

Yes
No

Comments

The Participant followed established procedures in conducting Sight Reading.

Yes
No

Comments

The Participant demonstrated a thorough knowledge of examination requirements and expectations from level to level.

Yes
No

Comments

The participant awarded marks that were appropriate and closely aligned with Official Marks.

Yes
No

Comments

The Participant was effective in special situations (i.e., special needs, adults, or any other unusual situations).

Yes
No

Comments

The Participant showed respect and courtesy for the students throughout the examination process.

Yes
No

Comments

The Participant was open to your suggestions and feedback.

Yes
No

Comments

Would you feel comfortable if this Participant assessed one of your students?

Yes
No

Comments

The Participant is ready to conduct remote examinations independently.

Yes
No

Comments

Additional Comments

For each of the following areas, please indicate the level of success, with 1 as lowest and 5 as highest.

Zoom communication skills and interaction with candidates.

Delivery of examination components (technical and musicianship tests)

Overall professionalism in conducting the examination

Awarding of appropriate marks

Alignment of marks and comments

5
4
3
2
1

Overall quality and content of written report

5
4
3
2
1

Writing style: full sentences, range of descriptive comments, syntax, grammar, spelling

5
4
3
2
1

Use of positive developmental language in examination report.

General Evaluation

Summary Comments for Academic Office

Recommendation of next steps

Ready to proceed to Final Practicum
Additional Practicum session(s) required
Status review recommended

Page 1
Participant
Presiding Examiner
Session #
	Please evaluate the RAC Participant’s performance by offering a YES or NO response and brief additional comments as appropriate:
The participant was punctual and appeared comfortable and at ease within the Zoom environment.	The participant was punctual and appeared comfortable and at ease within the Zoom environment. Yes No
Comments
The participant followed remote examination procedures as outlined in the RAC Guidelines.	The participant followed remote examination procedures as outlined in the RAC Guidelines. Yes No
Comments
The Participant conducted the examinations within the time blocks allotted.	The Participant conducted the examinations within the time blocks allotted. Yes No
Comments
The Participant was efficient in organizing and utilizing the examination materials.	The Participant was efficient in organizing and utilizing the examination materials. Yes No
Comments
The Participant followed established procedures in conducting Technical Tests.	The Participant followed established procedures in conducting Technical Tests. Yes No
Comments
The Participant followed established procedures in conducting Ear Tests.	The Participant followed established procedures in conducting Ear Tests. Yes No
Comments
The Participant followed established procedures in conducting Sight Reading.	The Participant followed established procedures in conducting Sight Reading. Yes No
Comments
The Participant demonstrated a thorough knowledge of examination requirements and expectations from level to level.	The Participant demonstrated a thorough knowledge of examination requirements and expectations from level to level. Yes No
Comments
The participant awarded marks that were appropriate and closely aligned with Official Marks.	The participant awarded marks that were appropriate and closely aligned with Official Marks. Yes No
Comments
The Participant was effective in special situations (i.e., special needs, adults, or any other unusual situations).	The Participant was effective in special situations (i.e., special needs, adults, or any other unusual situations). Yes No
Comments
The Participant showed respect and courtesy for the students throughout the examination process.	The Participant showed respect and courtesy for the students throughout the examination process. Yes No
Comments
The Participant was open to your suggestions and feedback.	The Participant was open to your suggestions and feedback. Yes No
Comments
Would you feel comfortable if this Participant assessed one of your students?	Would you feel comfortable if this Participant assessed one of your students? Yes No
Comments
The Participant is ready to conduct remote examinations independently.	The Participant is ready to conduct remote examinations independently. Yes No
Comments
Additional Comments
Page 2
	For each of the following areas, please indicate the level of success, with 1 as lowest and 5 as highest.
Zoom communication skills and interaction with candidates.	5 4 3 2 1
Delivery of examination components (technical and musicianship tests)	5 4 3 2 1
Overall professionalism in conducting the examination	5 4 3 2 1
Awarding of appropriate marks	5 4 3 2 1
Alignment of marks and comments	5 4 3 2 1
Overall quality and content of written report	5 4 3 2 1
Writing style: full sentences, range of descriptive comments, syntax, grammar, spelling	5 4 3 2 1
Use of positive developmental language in examination report.	5 4 3 2 1
General Evaluation	Excellent Very Good Good Satisfactory Needs Improvement
Summary Comments for Academic Office

Recommendation of next steps	Ready to proceed to Final Practicum Additional Practicum session(s) required Status review recommended